aphil.org

Aphorisms -- in context.

User Tools

Site Tools


en:nietzsche:werke:ac:ac-51

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

en:nietzsche:werke:ac:ac-51 [2015/07/19 11:59] (current)
babrak ↷ Page moved from en:nietzsche:works:ac:ac-51 to en:nietzsche:werke:ac:ac-51
Line 1: Line 1:
 +====== FN.-AC. §51 ======
 +===== The Antichrist. =====
 +<​tab>​The fact that faith, under certain circumstances,​ may work for blessedness,​ but that this blessedness produced by an //idée fixe// by no means makes the idea itself true, and the fact that faith actually moves no mountains, but instead //raises them up// where there were none before: all this is made sufficiently clear by a walk through a //lunatic asylum//. //Not//, of course, to a priest: for his instincts prompt him to the lie that sickness is not sickness and lunatic asylums not lunatic asylums. Christianity finds sickness //​necessary//,​ just as the Greek spirit had need of a superabundance of health–the actual ulterior purpose of the whole system of salvation of the church is to //make// people ill. And the church itself–doesn’t it set up a Catholic lunatic asylum as the ultimate ideal?​–The whole earth as a madhouse?​–The sort of religious man that the church //wants// is a typical //​décadent//;​ the moment at which a religious crisis dominates a people is always marked by epidemics of nervous disorder; the “inner world” of the religious man is so much like the “inner world” of the overstrung and exhausted that it is difficult to distinguish between them; the “highest” states of mind, held up before mankind by Christianity as of supreme worth, are actually epileptoid in form–the church has granted the name of holy only to lunatics or to gigantic frauds //in majorem dei honorem//​.... Once I ventured to designate the whole Christian system of //​training//​((The word //​training//​ is in English in the text.[--Ed.])) in penance and salvation (now best studied in England) as a method of producing a //folie circulaire//​ upon a soil already prepared for it, which is to say, a soil thoroughly unhealthy. Not every one may be a Christian. [:] one is not “converted” to Christianity–one must first be sick enough for it.... We others, who have the //courage// for health //and// likewise for contempt,​–we may well despise a religion that teaches misunderstanding of the body! that refuses to rid itself of the superstition about the soul! that makes a “virtue” of insufficient nourishment! that combats health as a sort of enemy, devil, temptation! that persuades itself that it is possible to carry about a “perfect soul” in a cadaver of a body, and that, to this end, had to devise for itself a new concept of “perfection,​” a pale, sickly, idiotically ecstatic state of existence, so-called “holiness”–a holiness that is itself merely a series of symptoms of an impoverished,​ enervated and incurably disordered body!... The Christian movement, as a European movement, was from the start no more than a general uprising of all sorts of outcast and refuse elements (–who now, under cover of Christianity,​ aspire to power). It does //not// represent the decay of a race; it represents, on the contrary, a conglomeration of //​décadence//​ products from all directions, crowding together and seeking one another out. It was //not//, as has been thought, the corruption of antiquity, of //noble// antiquity, which made Christianity possible; one cannot too sharply challenge the learned imbecility which today maintains that theory. At the time when the sick and rotten Chandala classes in the whole //​imperium//​ were Christianized,​ the //contrary type//, the nobility, reached its finest and ripest development. The majority became master; democracy, with its Christian instincts, //​triumphed//​.... Christianity was not “national,​” it was not based on race–it appealed to all the varieties of men disinherited by life, it had its allies everywhere. Christianity has the rancour of the sick at its very core–the instinct against the //​healthy//,​ against //health//. Everything that is well-constituted,​ proud, gallant and, above all, beautiful gives offence to its ears and eyes. Again I remind you of Paul’s priceless saying: “And God hath chosen the //weak// things of the world, the //foolish// things of the world, the //base// things of the world, and things which are //​despised//​”:​((I. [1] Corinthians i, 27, 28.[--Ed.])) //this// was the formula; //in hoc signo// the //​décadence//​ triumphed.–//​God on the cross//​–is man always to miss the frightful inner significance of this symbol?​–Everything that suffers, everything that hangs on the cross, is //​divine//​.... We all hang on the cross, consequently //we// are divine.... We alone are divine.... Christianity was thus a victory: a nobler attitude of mind was destroyed by it–Christianity remains to this day the greatest misfortune of humanity.–
  
 +===== Similarities to aphorisms by Nietzsche =====
 +
 +===== Similarities to aphorisms by others =====
 +
 +===== Academic interpretations =====
 +
 +===== Other connections =====
Back to top
en/nietzsche/werke/ac/ac-51.txt · Last modified: 2015/07/19 11:59 by babrak